Sequoia has agreed to turn over source code and design documents for its electronic voting machine system to the District of Columbia Board of Elections for examination. The Board hopes to discover what caused the software to add 1500 write-in votes to the totals in last year's September primary. One of Sequoia's original suggestions was that it was static discharge or human error. But the DC Board of Elections didn't buy it. They pursued, investigated, and finally decided to go to court. Sequoia immediately caved. Could it be because Sequoia doesn't own the intellectual property rights)?
National: Paper Presentation: Biomtric [sic] Voting system
AZ: Is Internet Voting Safe? Vote Here
CA: Elections Commission Looks at Instant Runoffs
DC: Firm to Give D.C. Information About Its Voting Devices
GA: Handel in hot water over voter screening
MS: Miss. voter ID supporter calls ruling victory
NJ: Mock election aims to fix voting machine flaws
OH: Trolling for chicks in Voter Vault
PA: 4 former ACORN workers will face trial in Pa.
SD: Election Night Results Rapid City City/School Election held on June 2, 2009
India: Some technological issues with elections.
Netherlands: changing the ROMs of a Nedap e-voting computer in 60 seconds
Philippines: With Due Respect Neither fraud-proof nor error-free
Published by VotersUnite.Org
Ellen Theisen (email@example.com), Director and Managing Editor
Dave Klein (Klein.David@VotersUnite.org), Editor
John Washburn (Washburn.John@VotersUnite.org), Editor
Daily Voting News was founded on February 6, 2004 by John Gideon (1947-2009). To assist with Daily Voting News, please send links to news articles to firstname.lastname@example.org. To donate, click here: http://www.votersunite.org/donate.asp.
"To encourage citizen ownership of transparent, participatory democracy." The Creekside Declaration March 22, 2008
**Articles and commentary included in “Daily Voting News” do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors of Daily Voting News, VotersUnite.Org, or its allied organizations. Articles are ed for inclusion to inform subscribers' ability to draw their own conclusions based on noteworthy and credible news, research, legislation, and debate bearing on the integrity of elections. **