Home
Site Map
Reports
Voting News
Info
Donate
Contact Us
About Us

VotersUnite.Org
is NOT!
associated with
votersunite.com


Voting news articles are provided here for research and educational purposes only. We do not review each article in its entirety prior to its posting. Content in the articles themselves and on other websites to which they link may express opinions that are not those of VotersUnite!

County, state officials will usher voters into the future (Lincoln Co., MS)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, August 2, 2005
Opinion Daily Leader 02 August 2005
Forward-thinking Lincoln County officials said this week they will take full advantage of a state-negotiated plan to provide touch-screen, computerized voting machines for the county.

Vote-machine idea runs into corporate problem (Volusia Co., FL)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, August 2, 2005
Kevin P. Connolly Orlando Sentinel 02 August 2005
DELAND For months, a ballot-marking device called AutoMark has been touted as a possible solution to Volusia's voting-equipment debate.

AccuPoll Announces ?SureCountTM? The Next Generation of Direct Recording Electronic Voting    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, August 2, 2005
Press Release AccuPoll 02 August 2005
TUSTIN, Calif. (ArriveNet - Aug 02, 2005) AccuPoll, Inc. (OCTBB: ACUP), a developer of Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting systems, today launched ?SureCount? featuring groundbreaking new Proof of Vote (PoV) options for the company?s next generation of DRE voting systems.

Voting officials challenged to provide paper backup (New Jersey)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, August 2, 2005
JEFFREY T. ZAINO Asbury Park Press 02 August 2005
In early July, acting Gov. Codey signed a law mandating that all electronic voting machines in New Jersey provide paper receipts by 2008.

Alameda County to reconsider Deibold voting machines (Alameda Co., CA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, August 2, 2005
Guy Ashley Contra Costa Times 02 August 2005
OAKLAND - Alameda County supervisors today said they would revisit an agreement with Diebold Election Systems for a $6 million upgrade of its touch-screen voting system, responding to problems the system showed in tests last month.

Utah stands by vote machines    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, August 1, 2005
Aaron Falk Deseret Morning News 01 August 2005
While California officials have rejected Diebold's electronic voting machines as too unreliable, Utah officials say they will stand by their $27 million decision to use the machines.

Counties hold cards on voting machines    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, August 1, 2005
Andy Kanengiser The Clarion Ledger 01 August 2005
County supervisors have three weeks to decide if they will accept or refuse touch-screen voting machines.

Bill would require paper ballot with electronic vote (Wisconsin)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, August 1, 2005
Anita Weier The Capital Times 01 August 2005
Legislators from both political parties have authored a bill that would require that electronic voting machines in Wisconsin produce a paper ballot that could be reviewed by the voter and that would be kept in case a recount is needed.

No vote on new voting machines. (Lancaster Co., PA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Sunday, July 31, 2005
Helen Colwell Adams Lancaster Sunday News 31 July 2005
LANCASTER COUNTY, PA - When you pull the big red lever on the voting machine this November, you might want to give that behemoth a fond pat on the way out of the booth.

Carteret officially severs tie to Unilect (Carteret Co., NC)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Saturday, July 30, 2005
JANNETTE PIPPIN Jacksonville Daily News 30 July 2005
BEAUFORT - The sides squared off Friday over Carteret County's voting-machine mess, and in the end elections officials reaffirmed their decision to abandon equipment blamed for losing nearly 4,500 votes last November.

Are new voting devices flawed? (Utah)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Saturday, July 30, 2005
Matt Canham Salt Lake Tribune 30 July 2005
 California has rejected Diebold's electronic voting booths, claiming the computer freezes and the printer jams too often.

N.C. bill requires trail of voting    Story Here  Archive
Published:Saturday, July 30, 2005
SHARIF DURHAMS AND MARK JOHNSON Charlotte Observer 30 July 2005
State lawmakers are pushing through a bill that would require all N.C. voting machines to produce a paper ballot or record that can be used in disputed elections.

E-voting doesn't beat paper ballots, state officials decide (Alameda Co., CA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Saturday, July 30, 2005
Associated Press 30 July 2005
SACRAMENTO - California election officials have rejected an electronic voting machine by Diebold after tests revealed unacceptable levels of screen freezes and paper jams.

Electronic vote system slated here is rejected (San Diego Co., CA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Saturday, July 30, 2005
Daniel J. Chac?n San Diego Union-Tribune 30 July 2005
The electronic voting system that San Diego County planned to start rolling out in November has been rejected by the Secretary of State's Office.

E-voting machines rejected (California)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, July 29, 2005
Ian Hoffman Oakland Tribune 29 July 2005
 After possibly the most extensive testing ever on a voting system, California has rejected Diebold's flagship electronic voting machine because of printer jams and screen freezes, sending local elections officials scrambling for other means of voting.

Hernando: Other counties not sold on Diebold (DeSoto Co., MS)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, July 29, 2005
Rino Dolbi DeSoto Times 29 July 2005
HERNANDO ? At least two other Mississippi counties who opted to not purchase Diebold voting machines say they are happy with their decision, even though that decision may cost them. And at least one group says their is reason for concerns about the accuracy of the machines which are being touted by Secretary of State Eric Clark.

City expects easy switch to optical scan voting (Southfield, MI)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, July 29, 2005
Pat Murphy Southfield Eccentric 29 July 2005
When Southfield voters go to the polls for the Sept. 13 primary election, they'll get their first working experience with the optical scan voting machines replacing the punch-card system.

Paper ballots among options facing Carteret (Carteret Co., NC)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, July 29, 2005
JANNETTE PIPPIN Jacksonville Daily News 29 July 2005
BEAUFORT - Candidates for Carteret County's town elections in November may have to wait a few extra hours to learn if they've won or lost if the county's Board of Elections and Board of Commissioners can't reach an agreement over leasing voting equipment.

E-voting machines rejected after state tests (California)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, July 29, 2005
JENNIFER COLEMAN, Associated Press 29 July 2005
SACRAMENTO (AP) - California election officials have rejected an electronic voting machine by Diebold after tests revealed unacceptable levels of screen freezes and paper jams.

Moore: What's wrong with voting machines?    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, July 28, 2005
Murvale Moore/ CNC 28 July 2005
Under a heading, "What's At Stake - Ensure all votes are counted," an activist group urged me to call my federal representative to support the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act (HR. 550), a bill designed to restore confidence in the outcomes of elections.

Records: 2701-2720 of 6703
<< Prev      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336      Next >>

 
Favorites

Election Problem Log image
2004 to 2009



Previous
Features


Accessibility Issues
Accessibility Issues


Cost Comparisons
Cost Comparisons


Flyers & Handouts
Handouts


VotersUnite News Exclusives


Search by

Copyright © 2004-2010 VotersUnite!