Home
Site Map
Reports
Voting News
Info
Donate
Contact Us
About Us

VotersUnite.Org
is NOT!
associated with
votersunite.com


Voting news articles are provided here for research and educational purposes only. We do not review each article in its entirety prior to its posting. Content in the articles themselves and on other websites to which they link may express opinions that are not those of VotersUnite!

Bell County receives funding for new voting machines    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, February 25, 2005
KCEN-TV, Texas. February 24, 2005
New voting machines could be on the way to Bell County soon and Thursday commissioners got some help paying for them.

DRE voting machines costly to use    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, February 25, 2005
Herald Tribune. February 25, 2005. By Rosemarie F. Myerson and Charles Edwards
Upon the recommendation of the Sarasota County supervisor of elections, the County Commission spent $4.7 million for direct-recording electronic voting machines in November 2001. The DREs were supposed to be less expensive to use than other machines.

Vote-machine firm protests exclusion from La. contract    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, February 25, 2005
The Advocate. February 25, 2005. By MARSHA SHULER
Diebold Election Systems has filed a formal protest challenging its exclusion from bidding on a potential $49 million contract to provide Louisiana with new voting machines.

County may take legal action: Commissioners in dispute with state over voting machines    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, February 25, 2005
Chillicothe Gazette. February 25, 2005. By Janelle Rucker,Gazette Staff Writer
The Ross County Board of Commissioners is taking another step in its fight against new voting machines mandated by Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell.

Auditors' votes on new machines mixed.    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, February 25, 2005
Daily Onpareil. February 25, 2005. By TOM MCMAHON, Staff Writer
Most southwest Iowa counties will be installing new voting machines next year. At a presentation demonstrating the new equipment this week, county auditors had a mixed reaction to what they saw.

Lake County and six other counties would be able to continue to use electronic voting machines    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, February 24, 2005
News-Herald (serving NE Ohio). February 24, 2005. By John Arthur Hutchison, Staff Writer
State Sen. Tim Grendell introduced legislation Wednesday that would grandfather Lake County and six other counties so that they can continue to use electronic voting machines.

Residents in 18 cities have ways to vote early    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, February 24, 2005
Sun-Sentinel. February 24, 2005. By Anthony Man, Staff writer
It's not called early voting, but residents of the 18 cities, towns and villages in Palm Beach County with elections on March 8 can vote early.

Surveys may help pick gear for voting    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, February 24, 2005
Indystar.com. February 24, 2005. By Jason Thomas.
Punch cards, optical scan machines, touch screens: Johnson County residents have used their fair share of voting equipment. A batch of surveys distributed after the November general election could help officials decide which procedure to use in the 2006 primary the county's next election.

Election rules pose shortfall: Counties must pay the cost of specially equipped voting machines.    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, February 24, 2005
Orlando Sentinel. February 24, 2005. By Robert Perez, Sentinel Staff Writer
The fallout from Florida's 2000 election debacle took many forms, but one of the bright spots was the federal push to make sure all voters, including the disabled, could vote. Under a federal mandate, special voting machines must be available by the end of this year in all U.S. polling places. In Florida, the state said it would foot the bill.

Rusk commissioners closer to consolidating polling places    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, February 24, 2005
Longview (TX) News-Journal. February 24, 2005. By MELISSA TRESNER
HENDERSON ? Rusk County Commissioners made some headway Wednesday morning in coming up with a plan to consolidate polling locations ? an effort to save money and trouble.

Editorial: Wrong precinct rule should be changed    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, February 24, 2005
Middletown Journal. February 24, 2005.
The importance of provisional ballots couldn?t be clearer after those cast in the Lakota School District were counted Tuesday.

Orangeburg County getting voting machines.    Story Here  Archive
Published:Wednesday, February 23, 2005
The Times and Democrat (SC). February 22, 2005. By TUCKER LYON, T&D Government Writer
Orangeburg County Council accepted an offer it couldn't refuse Tuesday ? a $1 million uniform electronic voting system that is mandated but will be fully financed by state and federal funds.

Other view: Rebuild trust in electoral process    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Debra Bowen, D-Redondo Beach Sacramento Bee 22 February 2005
Few things are more important in a democracy than the integrity of our electoral process.

Federal vote panel's hearings not public enough, group says    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Julie Carr Smyth Cleveland Plain Dealer 22 February 2005
Columbus - Ohio Citizen Action wants a federal elections panel to put the "public" back in "public hearing."

Computer voting to be evaluated by resident group.    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Amarillo-Globe News. February 22, 2005. By BETH WILSON
Computer voting is coming to Amarillo, but in what form and how much counties will have to pay are still undecided.

Secretary of State plans disabled voter workshop    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, February 22, 2005
BUD CHAMBERS Brenham Banner Press 22 February 2005
It wouldn't be that much of a stretch to say this morning's meeting of Washington County commissioners court was tabled.

Tackling Election Reform    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Opinion New York Times 22 February 2005
After a second consecutive presidential election marred by significant flaws in the mechanics of voting, it's time for Congress to take a hard look at fixing the system. Two Senate bills aim to do that. A Republican-sponsored bill is narrowly tailored around making electronic voting more reliable. A more ambitious bill, sponsored by the Democrats, would take on a broad array of problems, from long lines at the polls to odious maneuvers aimed at keeping people from voting. Both bills would greatly improve the functioning of American democracy.

Other view: California can lead way for nation    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Opinion Jeff Denham, Republican state senator from Merced Sacramento Bee 22 February 2005
Partisan politics has found its way into the business of state elections with accusations of trouble at the secretary of state's office. As the state's chief elections officer, the secretary of state has an ethical responsibility to remain above partisan politics. Despite an increase in recent voter turnout, trust in government remains extremely low.

Partial recounts a totally bad idea    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Jesse Jackson Chicago Sun Times 22 February 2005
Sometimes a decision made in the heat of partisan battle has reverberations for years to come.

League president: Turnout, confusion led to invalidation rate    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, February 22, 2005
JOHN McCARTHY Associated Press 22 February 2005
COLUMBUS, Ohio - The heavy turnout in the Nov. 2 election and poll-worker confusion contributed to the invalidation of ballots cast by many voters whose names didn't appear on registration logs kept at polling places, the president of the League of Women Voters said Tuesday.

Records: 3581-3600 of 6703
<< Prev      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336      Next >>

 
Favorites

Election Problem Log image
2004 to 2009



Previous
Features


Accessibility Issues
Accessibility Issues


Cost Comparisons
Cost Comparisons


Flyers & Handouts
Handouts


VotersUnite News Exclusives


Search by

Copyright © 2004-2010 VotersUnite!